Governance and Collaboration: An Evolutionary Study of Two Mental Health Networks
نویسندگان
چکیده
As examples of a state of agents, this paper will present a comparative analysis of the evolution of two community mental health networks that both have similar contracts from the State of Arizona and operate under the same set of rules. One of these is governed by a for-profit firm that both produces services directly and buys them from a network of nonprofit agencies. The other is governed by a community based nonprofit that contracts with four separate nonprofit networks to offer services. These networks are analyzed, using social network analysis, at the beginning of the system and four years later. The mature network is compared to the new network. The for-profit governed system is compared to the nonprofit governed system. The paper discusses the evolution of structure over time and a limited comparison of the networks in terms of which produced higher quality outcomes.
منابع مشابه
A Case for Open Network Health Systems: Systems as Networks in Public Mental Health
Increases in incidents involving so-called confused persons have brought attention to the potential costs of recent changes to public mental health (PMH) services in the Netherlands. Decentralized under the (Community) Participation Act (2014), local governments must find resources to compensate for reduced central funding to such services or “innovate.” But innovation, even when pressure for c...
متن کاملMental health network governance: comparative analysis across Canadian regions
OBJECTIVE Modes of governance were compared in ten local mental health networks in diverse contexts (rural/urban and regionalized/non-regionalized) to clarify the governance processes that foster inter-organizational collaboration and the conditions that support them. METHODS Case studies of ten local mental health networks were developed using qualitative methods of document review, semi-str...
متن کاملPolycentrism in Global Health Governance Scholarship; Comment on “Four Challenges That Global Health Networks Face”
Drawing on an in-depth analysis of eight global health networks, a recent essay in this journal argued that global health networks face four challenges to their effectiveness: problem definition, positioning, coalition-building, and governance. While sharing the argument of the essay concerned, in this commentary, we argue that these analytical concepts can be used to explicate a concept that h...
متن کاملBehavioral Factors Influencing on Designing Network Governance Model in Health Care Domain: A systematic literature review
Background: Establishment of the intra-organizational collaboration network has become a critical strategy to provide high-quality services with a low cost in the health system. In order to utilize the benefits of collaborative networks, an appropriate governance model in accordance with the health system is required. To design a successful model of network governance, different effective facto...
متن کاملAnalysis of Intersectoral Collaboration in the Iranian Health System for Implementing Health in all Policies: Challenges and the Way Forward (This Research was Conducted Before the Covoid-19 Pandemic)
Background and Aim: For achievement of equity in the population health the implementation of health in all policies is essential. The most crucial intervention in this approach is inter-sectoral collaboration. Materials and Methods: This was a qualitative study based on the national policy framework. Data were collected using literature review, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions ...
متن کامل